BIBLIOGRAPHY 
(List of books) 
of Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski

	01. Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Prognostics. Theoretical and Methodological Problems. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1993. - 288 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-799-178-7;
	02. Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Document for Identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 1. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1994. - 640 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-02-4;
	03. Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Document for identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 2. Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1995. - 576 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-04-0;
	04. Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Introduction to the Psychology of Law. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 1998. - 322 pр.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-06-7;
	05. Iankov Ianko, Psychology of Law. Vol. 1. Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2002. - 518 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-18-0 (Vol. 1);
	06. Iankov Ianko, Document for identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 3. Bulgarian State Abdicates in Favour of the Red Mafia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2002. - 576 рp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-07-5 (Vol. 3);
	07. Iankov Ianko, Document for identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 4. Who Is the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2003. - 568 pр. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-09-1 (Vol. 4);
	08. Iankov Ianko, Document for identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 5, Who Is the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2003. - 546 pр. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-20-2 (Vol. 5);
	09. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Mesopotamia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 148 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16); ISBN 954-8550-24-5;
	10. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient Egypt. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 94 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-25-3;
	11. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient Iran. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 98 pр.,  (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-26-1;
	12. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Judea. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 126 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-27-х;
	13. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient China. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 132 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-28-8;
	14. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient India. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 94 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-29-6;
	15. Iankov Ianko, Alphabetical Truths. Sparks of Wit, Nominated by Dungeon. -  Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 352 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-11-3;
	16. Iankov Ianko, The Euthanasia. Thanatological Aspects. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 76 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-32-6;
	17. Iankov Ianko, The Death Penalty. Thanatological Aspects. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. -134 pр.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-15-6;
	18. Iankov Ianko, Introduction to Thanatology. Phenomenology of Life and Death. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 202 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-21-0;
	19. Iankov Ianko, The Russian Terrorism. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 130 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-33-4; 
	20. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient Greece. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 532 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-30-х;
	21. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Ancient Rome. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 456 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-31-8;
	22. Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Terrorism. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 176 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-34-2;
	23. Iankov Ianko, Chronology of Most Notorious Terrorist Acts. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2004. - 150 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-35-0;
	24. Iankov Ianko, Document for Identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 6. Who Is the West Defending – Human Rights or Red Mafia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2005. - 526 pр. (Gross Dimensions: 70 x 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-22-9 (Vol. 6);
	25. Iankov Ianko, Prognostics. Theoretical and Methodological Problems. (Second Edition). - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006, 444 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16 ) ISBN 954-8550-37-7;
	26. Iankov Ianko, The Кilling. Thanatological Aspects. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 142 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16) ISBN-10: 954-8550-54-7; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-54-3;
	27. Iankov Ianko, The Suicide. Thanatological Aspects. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 126 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16) ISBN-10: 954-8550-53-9; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-53-6; 
	28. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of the Medieval Orient. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 150 pр. (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16) ISBN-10: 954-8550-50-4; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-50-5;
	29. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines of Bizantia. - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 166 pр.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16)  ISBN-10: 954-8550-49-0; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-49-9;
	30. Iankov Ianko, The Political Killings. Book One. Who Killed Volodya Nakov. (Documentary). - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 150 pp.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-10-5;
	31. Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Terrorism. (Second Edition) - Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 226 pp.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16)  ISBN-10: 954-8550-51-2; ISBN-13:978-954-8550-51-2;
	32. Iankov Ianko, The Secret Services and the Scientific Fellows in Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Sofia University. (Political Documentary. Book One). -  Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 144 pp.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16)  ISBN-10: 954-8550-48-2; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-48-2;
	33. Iankov Ianko,  Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 1. The Ancient East, – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 486   pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 1);
	34. Iankov Ianko,  Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 2. Ancient Europe. Grece – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 452 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 2); 
	35. Iankov Ianko,  Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 3. Ancient Europe. Rome – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 412 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16)  ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 3); 
	36. Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Terrorism. (Thrid Edition) - Sofia, Mirror Publishing Company, 2006. - 222 pp.  (Normal Dimensions: 60 x 84/ 16);
	37. Iankov Ianko, The Political Killings. Who Prevented Me from Killing the Vice President Yaroslav Radev and the Ex-Prime Minister Andrey Lukanov. (Documentary), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007. - 156 pp. (Normal Dimensions: 60 х 84/ 16) ISBN-10: 954-8550-12-1 (Vol. 2); ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-12-3 (Vol. 2);
	38. Iankov Ianko, Thanatology. A Science for Humanization of Life through Demystification  of Death, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007. - 752 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16), ISBN-10: 954-8550-36-9; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-36-9;
	39. Iankov Ianko, The Pandora’s Box. A Kaleidoscopic Vision on Terrorism, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007. - 630 pp. (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16), ISBN-10: 954-8550-16-4; ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-16-1;
	40. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal genesis Vol. 4. Middle Ages, Book 1. Orient. Byzantium, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007. - 230 pp., (Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16), ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-61-1; 
	41. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis, Vol. 5. Book 2. Russia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 744 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-62-8; 
	42. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 6. Middle Ages. Book 3. Western Europe. Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 478 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-63-5; 
	43. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 7.The New Time. Book 1, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 447 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-65-9; 
	44. Iankov Ianko, Science notes and fragments. (Parameters of psychotronic power and capacity to protect human nature), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 470 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-69-7;
	45. Iankov Ianko,Document for Identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 7, Conclusive Messages to the Mafia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 546 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-57-1, ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-57-4; 
	46. Iankov Ianko, Document for Identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 8, Conclusive Messages to the Mafia. Letters to European and World Institutions and Leaders, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 640 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-58-1; 
	47. Iankov Ianko, Document for Identity. Political Documentary. Vol. 9. Letters to European and World Institutions and Leaders. Conclusive Messages to the Mafia, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 620 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-60-4; 
	48. Iankov Ianko, The Legitimate Bases of Political Power in Bulgaria, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2007, 491 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN-10: 954-8550-14-8, ISBN-13: 978-954-8550-14-7; 
	49. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 8.The New Time. Book 2, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2008, 445 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-66-6; 
	50. Iankov Ianko, Articles. Studies. Notes, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 421 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-68-0; 
	51. Iankov Ianko, The Bulgarian Post-communist Genocide (Documentary), Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 430 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-64-2; 
	52. Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 9.The New Time. Book 3, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, 400 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN 978-954-8550-67-3; 

	Preparing for printing:
	53. Iankov Ianko, The Sofian Water and the Genocide on Sofian Citizens , Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2010, Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16, 200 pp., ISBN: 978-954-8550-82-6; 
54. Iankov Ianko, Elites. Secret Services. Secret Power, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2011, 300 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100 х 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-73-4;
	55. Iankov Ianko, Political Mythology, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2012, 350 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-39-0;
	56. Iankov Ianko, Rhetoric, Ianus Publishing Company, 2013, 400 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-70-3;
	57. Iankov Ianko, Philosophy of Law, Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2013, 500 pp., Gross Dimensions: 70 х 100/ 16, ISBN: 978-954-8550-59-8;

*   *  *

CONTENTS of some  of books of  Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:41 am    Post subject: 
PANDORA'S BOX. A KALEIDOSCOPIC VISION ON TERRORISM 3311

Ianko Iankov. Pandora’s box. A Kaleidoscopic Vision on Terrorism. - Sofia, IANUS Publishing Co., 2007.  – 630 pp.

Preface							     5 
I. Definitiveness and conceptualization of terrorism	     7 
II. Anti-tyrant background of terrorism			   41 
III. French terrorist model					   46 
IV. Russian prewar terrorism				   60 
V. European prewar terrorism	 			 104 
VI. Terrorism between the two world wars		 106 
§ 1. Terrorism in the USSR					 106 
§ 2. Terrorism in Fascist Italy				 138 
§ 3. Terrorism in Nazi Germany				 142 
VII. Terrorism since the Second World War		 153 
VIII. Some modern forms and types of terrorism	 166 
§ 1. Chechen terrorism					 166 
§ 2. Islamist terrorism					 188 
§ 3. Kurdish terrorism					 197 
§ 4. Irish terrorism						 209 
§ 5. Basque terrorism					 213 
§ 6. Sikh terrorism						 214 
§ 7. International terrorism					 215 
§ 8. Nuclear and Radiation Terrorism			 217 
§ 9. Agro-terrorism and bioterrorism			 220 
§ 10. Information terrorism					 229 
§ 11. Cyber-terrorism 					 230 
§ 12. Household socio-terrorism				 232 
§ 13. Banditry							 233 
§ 14. Kamikaze phenomenon					 237 
§ 15. Eco-defense radical terrorism				 243 
§ 16. Political terrorism					 244 
§ 17. State terrorism						 253 
§ 18. Women terrorism					 258 
§ 19. Economic terrorism					 259 
IX. Bulgarian tribute to terrorism				 260 
§ 1. Briefly about the beginning				 260 
§ 2. Vasil Levski						 261 
§ 3. Hristo Botev						 269 
§ 4. Hristo Belchev murder					 279 
§ 5. The murder of Stefan Stambolov			 285 
§ 6. Thessalonike’s boatmen 					 289 
§ 7. Attempt on the life of Ferdinand 			 291 
§ 8. Anton Prudkin						 298 
§ 9. Casinos in Sofia						 303 
§ 10. American Embassy					 304 
§ 11. Arabakonak’s attack					 305 
§ 12. The "Holy Sunday"					 306 
§ 13. Docho Uzunov						 308 
§ 14. "Heroic communists” 					 310 
§ 15. Vlado Chernozemski 					 316 
§ 16. Terrorism during the socialist government		 317 
A. The state terrorism					 317 
B. Anti-state terrorism					 340 
§ 17. Berlinguer case						 350 
§ 18. Uwe Barshel case					 352 
§ 19. Georgi Markov						 353 
§ 20. Kidnappings of Bulgarian emigrants			 386 
§ 21. The judicial murder of witnesses			 394 
§ 22. Bulgarian medicated terrorism			 395 
A. Bulgarian medics in Libya				 395 
B. The experiments of Prof. B. Shishkov 			 430 
C. Experiments in Burgas’ hospital				 436 
D. The Bulgarian “growth hormones“ 	 		 439 
E. Experiments of Plovdiv dentists				 443 
Some psychological aspects of terrorism			 447 
ANNEX: History's most famous terrorist acts		 464
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:47 am    Post subject: 
MIDDLE AGES, BOOK 3. MEDIEVAL WESTERN EUROPE, VOL.6. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES3311

Ianko Iankov. Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. 
Vol. 6, Book 3. Middle Ages. Western Europe. 
Sofia, IANUS Publishing Company, 2007. – 477 pp. 

Contents 

Chapter V. Political and legal doctrines 
of Medieval Western Europe 

§ 1. Of the patristic era						   6 
§ 2. Boethius								   8 
§ 3. Gregory Turkish							 14 
§ 4. Carolingian Renaissance						 18 
§ 5. Anselm of Canterbury						 27 
§ 6. Arnold of Brescia						 29 
§ 7. Pierre Abelard							 32 
§ 8. Bernard de Clairvaux 						 37 
§ 9. Pierre Lombard							 39 
§ 10. John of Salisbury 						 40 
§ 11. Franciscus Assiensis 						   43 
§ 12. Berthold of Regensburg 					   47 
§ 13. Henry de Bracton 						   55 
§ 14. Roger Bacon							   57 
§ 15. Giovanni Bonaventura						   61 
§ 16. Thomas Aquinas						   63 
§ 17. Boetius Dacos 							   88 
§ 18. Raimundus Lullius						   89 
§ 19. Siger de Brabant						   90 
§ 20. Jean de Paris							   92 
§ 21. Dante Alighieri							   95 
§ 22. Marsilius of Padua						 108 
§ 23. William Occam							 112 
§ 24. Petrarca								 123 
§ 25. Giovanni Boccaccio						 130 
§ 26. John Wycliffe							 135 
§ 27. Geoffrey Chaucer						 143 
§ 28. Jan Hus								 144 
§ 29. Tito Livio Frulovisi						 154 
§ 30. Nicholai de Cusa						 160 
§ 31. Leon Battista Alberti						 163 
§ 32. Lorenzo Valla 							 173 
§ 33. Matteo Palmieri							 177 
§ 34. Joan of Arc							 179 
§ 35. Girolamo Savonarola						 183 
§ 36. Sebastian Brant							 190 
§ 37. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola					 191 
§ 38. Thomas Murner							 192 
§ 39. Desiderius Erasmus						 193 
§ 40. Niccolo Machiavelli						 205 
§ 41. Thomas Moore							 221 
§ 42. Francesco Gvichardini						229 
§ 44. Francisco de Vitoria						239 
§ 45. Ulrich von Huten						240 
§ 46. Thomas Muntzer						242 
§ 47. Queen Marguerite de Navarre					246 
§ 48. Francois Rabelais						248 
§ 49. Philip Melanchton						250 
§ 50. Thomas Starkey							251 
§ 51. Sebastian Frank							256 
§ 52. Charles V Habsburg						257 
§ 53. Michel Nostradamus						261 
§ 54. Michel de L’Hopital						271 
§ 55. Jean Calvin							271 
§ 56. Antonio Francesco Doni					282 
§ 57. François Autman 						282 
§ 58. Etienne de Laboesi	 					284 
§ 59. Jean Bodin							287 
§ 60. Michel de Montaigne						313 
§ 61. Miguel de Cervantes						316 
§ 62. Edward Coke							325 
§ 63. Francis Bacon							327 
§ 64. Christopher Marlowe						331 
§ 65. William Shakespeare						335 
§ 66. Tommazo Campanella						340 
§ 67. Hugo Grotius							356 
§ 68. Robert Filmer							385 
§ 69. The fate of Roman law						386 
§ 70. Inquisition							394 
§ 71. The discovery of the New World				400 
§ 72. University							402 
§ 73. Science								407 
§ 74. Chivalry								425 
§ 75. God's court							429 
§ 76. Gender vision of the Middle Ages				436 
§ 77. Courtesy vassalage						442 
§ 78. Humanism and the Renaissance				446 
§ 79. Reformation							464
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:39 am    Post subject: 
MIDDLE AGES, BOOK 2. MEDIEVAL RUSSIA. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES3311

Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. 
Vol. 5, Book 2. Middle Ages. Russia. 
Sofia, IANUS Publishing Company, 2007. – 744 pp. 

Contents 

Chapter IV. Political and legal doctrines 
of Medieval Russia 

§ 1. Nature of political and legal ideas 
exercises in Kiev’s Russia							  9 
1. Introduction								  9 
2. The concept of "Russian land"						14 
3. The concept of the divine origin 
of prince's power								15 
4. Hillarion of Kiev								26 
6. Daniel Zatochnik								29 

§ 2. Nature of political and legal ideas and doctrines 
of Moscow’s Russia								31 
1. Some highlights from historical and political genesis 
of Moscow’s Russia								31 
2. Kiev’s genesis of Moscow’s Russia					34 
3. The Roman origin of the Russian princes					36 
4. Monks from behind Volga for "selflessness"	 			38 
5. Joseph Volotski								46 
6. "The Russian Pravda”							49 
7. Prince Ivan III								51 
8. Pskov’s monk Filotei							54 
9. Fedor Karpov								57 
10. Zinoviy Otenski								59 
11. Ivan S. Peresvetov							63 
12. Ivan IV the Terrible							65 
13. Andrei Kurbski								69 
14. Ivan Timofeev								72 
15. Protopop Avvakum							74 
16. Latin and Greek "schools”						76 
17. Afanasiy Ordin-Nashchokin						 84 
18. Metropolitan Stefan Yavorski						 85 
19. Archbishop Theophanes Prokopovich					 86 
20. Peter I the Great.								 92 
21. Vasily N. Tatishchev							 96 
22. Ivan Pososhkov								 99 
23. Antiochus Kantemir							102 
24. Condition of 1730								103 
25. Catherine II								107 
26. Michael Shcherbatov							113 
27. Dmitry Golitsin								118 
28. Semyon Desnitski								120 
29. Nikolay I. Novikov							124 
30. Alexander Radishchev							126 
31. Vasily Malinovsky							131 
32. Michael Speranski							131 
33. Nikolay Karamzin							139 
34. Emperor Alexander I							144 
35. Decembrist revolt								150 
36. Sergei Uvarov								157 
37. Nikolay Turgenev								159 
38. Gavril Batenkov								160 
39. Peter Chaadaev								162 
40. Alexander Pushkin							167 
41. Orest Novitskiy								182 
42. Alexander Homyakov							184 
43. Ivan Kireevski								191 
44. Nikolay Gogol								196 
45. Constantine Kavelin							197 
46. Timofey Granovski							202 
47. Michael Pogodin								206 
48. Stepan Shevairyov							210 
49. Fedor Tyutchev								212 
50. Constantine Nevolin							215 
51. Vissarion Belinski							222 
52. Alexander Herzen								225 
53. Nikolay Ogaryov								228 
54. Nikolay Stankevich							230 
55. Pavel Annenkov								231 
56. Mikhail Bakunin								232 
57. Aksakov father and brothers						241 
58. Constantine Kavelin							244 
59. Mikhail Katkov								246 
60. Yuri Samarium								247 
61. Sergei Solovyov								248 
62. Fyodor Dostoevsky							252 
63. Michael Butashevich-Petrashevski					282 
64. Apollon Grigoryev							283 
65. Nikolay Danilevski							284 
66. Pyotr Lavrov								296 
67. Rostislav Фадеев								300 
68. Alexander Stronin							300 
69. Constantine Pobedonostsev						303 
70. Boris Chicherin								304 
71. Nicholay Strahov								317 
72. Nikolay Chernyshevsky							318 
73. Leo Tolstoy								329 
74. Victor Kudryavtsev-Platonov						338 
75. Konstantin Leontiev							342 
76. Nikolay Nelidov								352 
77. Nicholay Khlebnikov							356 
78. Dmitry Pissarev								358 
79. Basil Klyuchevski							359 
80. Nikolay Petkov								360 
81. Pyotr Kropotkin								364 
82. Eugene de Roberti							371 
83. Peter Tkachyov								376 
84. Sergei Vitte								383 
85. Nikolay Kareev								384 
86. Maxim Kovalevskiy							391 
87. Vladimir Solovyov							396 
88. Nicholay Korkunov							405 
89. Nikolay Morozov								407 
90. Vasily Rozanov								411 
91. George Plehanoff								412 
92. Alexander Bashmakov							414 
93. Robert 									416 
94. Act of 1861 repealing the law of serfdom				420 
95. Petr Stolypin								428 
96. Sergei Trubetskoy							431 
97. Yevgeny Trubetskoy							432 
98. Lapo-Danilevski								436 
99. Mikhail Tugan-Baranovski						437 
100. Paul Novgorodtsev							439 
101. Joseph Petkov								448 
102. Lev Petrazhitski								450 
103. Maxim Gorky								453 
104. Bogdan Kistyakovski							455 
105. Piotr Struve								460 
106. Vladimir Lenin								464 
107. Sergei Bulgakov								472 
108. Alexander Bogdanov-Malinovsky					480 
109. Victor Tchernov								484 
110. Nikolay Berdyaev							487 
111. Eugene Spektorski							496 
112. Semyon Frank								497 
113. Alexander Yashchenko							502 
114. Gustav Shpetim								504 
115. Nikolay Alexeyev							506 
116. Joseph Stalin								508 
117. Leon Trotsky								524 
118. Peter Bitsilli								527 
119. Alexander Sakketi							529 
120. Lev Karsavin								532 
121. Ivan Ilyin								534 
122. Ivan Kinkel								543 
123. Georgy Fedotov								544 
124. Nikolay Timashyov							554 
125. Pitirim Sorokin								558 
126. Nikolay Ustryalov							567 
127. Nikolay Trubetskoy							568 
128. Ivan Solonevich								570 
129. Nikolay Kondratiev							573 
130. Aleskey Losev								577 
131. George Florovski							585 
132. Georges Gurvich							589 
133. Nikita Khrushchev							592 
134. Peter Savitski								596 
135. Alexander Chizhevski							604 
136. Vladimir Nabokov							605 
137. Alexander Kozhev							607 
138. Leonid Brezhnev							610 
139. Pyotr Grigorenko							614 
140. Yuri Andropov								616 
141. Alexander Solzhenitsyn							617 
142. Andrei Sakharov								634 
143. Nikolay Poltoratski							637 
144. Alexander Zinoviev							638 
145. Igor Shafarevich								640 
146. Roy Medvedev								642 
147. Anatoly Butenko							644 
148. Dmitri Volkogonov							646 
149. Alexander Janov								647 
150. Boris Yeltsin								648 
151. Mikhail Gorbachev							651 
152. Nikolay Hrenov								662 
153. Vladimir Bukovsky							664 
154. Vladimir Putin								667 
155. Dmitry Medvedev							669 
156. Slavophiles, Occidentalism and Pan-Slavism				670 
157. "Russian idea"								686 
158. Eurasianism								707 
159. Die-hard reactionary							712 
160. Smenovehovstvo							715 
161. Russian nihilism								716 
152. Russian liberalism							719 
163. Russian "Silver Age"							721 
164. On the specifics of Russia's 
political and legal culture							727 
165. Socio-portrait touches to the image 
of Soviet and post-Soviet man						733 
Instead of conclusion: 
"Third Rome", "Second Europe" or "Third World"			736
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:41 pm    Post subject: 
MIDDLE AGES, BOOK 1. ORIENT, BYZANTIUM. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES3311

Ianko Iankov. Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. 
Vol. 4. Middle Ages, Book 1. Orient. Byzantium. 
Sofia, IANUS Publishing Company, 2007. – 230 pp. 

Contents 

Chapter I. The question of the chronological limits 
of the Middle Ages								5 

Chapter II. Political and legal doctrines 
of the Orient									12 

§ 1. Orient and its "guidance						12 
1. Arab Orient before Islam 							14 
2. Mohammed before Hizhdra						16 
3. Mohammed after Hizhdra							22 
4. The Islamic world after Mohammed				 	26 

§ 2. Sectarian and intellectual phenomena in Islam			33 
1. Haridzhism									33 
2. Shiism									34 
3. Sufism									34 
4. Philosophy									35 
5. Science									36 
6. Literature									36 
7. Art										37 

§ 3. Islamic Law								38 
1. Religious nature of Islamic law						38 
2. The political nature of Islamic law					44 
3. Anthropological essence of Islamic Law					50 
4. The legal nature of Islamic law						53 
5. Subjects of Islamic law							68 
6. Legal facts									70 
7. The parameters of Islamic rule						73 
8. Values protected by Islamic law						81 
9. Crime and punishment in Islamic law					85 
10. Some comparative aspects						90 

§ 4. Rationalistic social and political 
concepts of Oriental thinkers						96 

Chapter III. Political and legal doctrines 
of Byzantium									105 

§ 1. Origin and Development of Byzantium				105 
1. Reasons and conditions for the emergence 
of the Byzantine Empire							105 
2. Historical development of the Byzantine State				110 
3. Historical development of Byzantine					119 

§ 2. Nature of political and legal 
ideas and exercises in Byzantium						122 
1. Genesis and nature of Bysantism 						122 
2. Aryanism									154 
3. Atanasism									157 
4. Nestorianism								162 
5. Monophysitism								163 
6. Iconoclasm									164 
7. John Filopon								165 
8. Leontiy Byzantine								166 
9. "Areopagitka								166 
10. Maximus the Confessor							168 
11. John of Damascus								169 
12. Paulikyanism								170 
13. Patriarch Photios								171 
14. Leo the Mathematician							179 
15. Konstantin-Michael Psellos						179 
16. Hesychasm								183 
17. Calabrian Barlaam							184 
18. Georg Chemist Plifon							184 
19. Philosophical thought in Byzantium					185 
20. Byzantine law								189 
21. Eastern and Western Christianity						206
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:31 am    Post subject: 
ANCIENT ROME. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES, Vol. 3 3311

Янков Янко, Политически и правни учения. Основни аспекти на политико-правния генезис. Том 3. Древна Европа. Рим – С., “Янус”, 2006. - 412 с. (70 х 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-44-Х (Том 3); 

Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 3. Ancient Europe. Rome – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 412 pp. (70 х 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 3); 

Yankov Yanko, Doctrines politiques et juridiques. Aspects principaux de la genèse juridique et politique. Volume 3. L’Europe Ancienne. Rome – S., “Yanus”, 2006; 

Ianko Iankov, Politische und rechtliche Lehren. Grundaspekte der politisch-rechtlichen Genesis. Band 2. (Antikes Europa. Rom). S. Janus, 2006. 

Content 

§ 1. Origin and Development of Ancient Rome				 5 
§ 2. Religion and Mythology of Ancient Rome				 27 
§ 3. Character and historical significance of Roman culture 
and socio-political phenomenon						 32 
§ 4. "First steps" of Roman culture						 35 
§ 5. Cato									 44 
§ 6. Quintus Ennius								 50 
§ 7. Cultural and political circle of Scipio					 61 
§ 8. Polybius									 77 
§ 9. Cicero									105 
§ 10. Diodorus Siculus							129 
§ 11. Julius Caesar								130 
§ 12. Lucretius								141 
§ 13. Guy Salustius Crisp							149 
§ 14. Virgil									162 
§ 15. Horace									183 
§ 16. Strabo									204 
§ 17. Livy									206 
§ 18. Propertius								208 
§ 19. Ovid									210 
§ 20. Dionysius Halicarnatii							217 
§ 21. Petronius								218 
§ 22. Seneca the Elder							220 
§ 23. Seneca Young								225 
§ 24. Kvintilian								230 
§ 25. Josephus									232 
§ 26. Marcus Annaeus Onions						249 
§ 27. Plutarch									254 
§ 28. Epictetus								267 
§ 29. Cornelius Tacitus							269 
§ 30. Pliny the Younger							281 
§ 31. Gaius Suetonius Trankvil						285 
§ 32. Appian Alexandria							287 
§ 33. Marcus Aurelius							290 
§ 34. John the Baptist								300 
§ 35. Jesus Christ and Christianity						308 
§ 36. Aval Gellius								399 
§ 37. Justin									401 
§ 38. Tertullian								402 
§ 39. Orig									404 
§ 40. Plotinus									405 
§ 41. Ammian Marcellin							407 
§ 42. Flavius Claudius Julian							409 
§ 43. Quintus Aurelius Sima							411 
§ 44. Aurelius Augustine							413 
§ 45. Olimpiodor Theban							417 
§ 46. Paul 									420 
§ 47. Sext Aurelius Victor							423 
§ 48. Acoustic nature of the ancient Roman 
philosophical and political thought						425 
§ 49. To the question of the ancient teachings 
the best form of state structure						430 
§ 50. To the question of the ancient doctrine of the ideal citizen		435 
§ 51. To the question of the ancient doctrine of the ideal ruler		441 
§ 52. Roman socio-political utopianism					451 
§ 53. Sacred-political function of gladiatorship				460 
§ 54. Roman empire and imperial power					466
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:06 am    Post subject: 
ANCIENT GREECE. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES, VOL. 2 3311

Янков Янко, Политически и правни учения. Основни аспекти на политико-правния генезис. Том 2. Древна Европа. Гърция – С., “Янус”, 2006. - 452 с. (70 х 100/ 16) ; ISBN 954-8550-43-1 (Том 2); 

Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 2. Ancient Europe. Grece – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 452 pp. (70 х 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 2); 

Yankov Yanko, Doctrines politiques et juridiques. Aspects principaux de la genèse juridique et politique. Volume 2. L’Europe Ancienne. Grèce – S., “Yanus”, 2006; 

Ianko Iankov, Politische und rechtliche Lehren. Grundaspekte der politisch-rechtlichen Genesis. Band 2. (Antikes Europa. Griechenland). S. Janus, 2006. 

Content 

§ 1. Cultural and social event state 
and validation of Ancient Greece				    5 
§ 2. Religion of Ancient Greece				  14 
§ 3. Mythology of Ancient Greece				  36 
§ 4. Homer's epic						  45 
§ 5. Hesiod's epic						  73 
§ 6. Creativity of the Seven Sages				  90 
§ 7. Aesop							  98 
§ 8. Teognid							 107 
§ 9. Pisistrat							 111 
§ 10. Pythagoras						 126 
§ 11. Heraclitus						 133 
§ 12. Aeschylus						 136 
§ 13. Anaxagoras						 154 
§ 14. Hyperbole						 158 
§ 15. Sophocles						 166 
§ 16. Euripides						 182 
§ 17. Aristophanes						 186 
§ 18. Herodotus						 194 
§ 19. Sophists							 202 
§ 20. Democritus						 208 
§ 21. Socrates							 218 
§ 22. Chrittias							 261 
§ 23. Thucydides						 274 
§ 24. Lyssias							 279 
§ 25. Isocrates							 287 
§ 26. Xenophon						 296 
§ 27. Plato							 310 
§ 28. Diogenes of Synops					 336 
§ 29. Aristotle							 340 
§ 30. Alexander Macedonians				 378 
§ 31. Demosthenes						 399 
§ 32. Evgemer							 404 
§ 33. Epicurus							 405 
§ 34. Stoicism and skepticism				 418 
§ 35. Institute of ostracism 					 422 
§ 36. Political role of masses					 441 
§ 37. The evolution of the outlook for freedom 
and Political Violence in Ancient Greece			 453 
§ 38. Persianism in political life of Ancient Greece		 463 
§ 39.Complement: Political and Legal Ideas 
of Ancient Thrace						 469 

_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:31 pm    Post subject: 
ANCIENT EAST. POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINES, Vol. 1 3311

Янков Янко, Политически и правни учения. Основни аспекти на политико-правния генезис. Том 1. Древен Изток, – С., “Янус”, 2006. - 486 с. (70 х 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Том 1); 

Iankov Ianko, Political and Legal Doctrines. Basic Aspects of Political and Legal Genesis. Vol. 1. The Ancient East, – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Company, 2006. - 486 pp. (70 х 100/ 16) ISBN 954-8550-42-3 (Vol. 1); 

Yankov Yanko, Doctrines politiques et juridiques. Aspects principaux de la genèse juridique et politique. Volume 1. L’Antique Orient – S., “Yanus”, 2006; 

Ianko Iankov, Politische und rechtliche Lehren. Grundaspekte der politisch-rechtlichen Genesis. Band 1. (Antiker Osten). S. Janus, 2006. 

Content 
Instead of an Introduction						   8 

Chapter I. Political and legal doctrines of Mesopotamia	 11 

§ 1. The most common characteristic of the first 
and the oldest civilization in the world				 11 
1. Inception of the Mesopotamian civilization			 11 
2. Mesopotamian religion and mythology				 18 
3. Mesopotamian writing, literature and science			 32 
4. Social stratification and everyday life				 38 
5. War as a way of life of the first civilization			 40 

§ 2. Power management system and state in Mesopotamia	 45 
1. Emergence and establishment of urban civilization 
and statehood								 45 
2. Ruler								 50 
3. Council (National Assembly) 					 54 
4. Babylon								 64 
5. Assyria								 72 
6. Accad								 79 
7. Hattie								 80 

§ 3. Origin and development of written law in Mesopotamia	 87 
1. Reasons for emerging of Mesopotamian law and its role in 
human culture								 87 
2. Genre characteristic of Mesopotamian law			 94 
3. Specific characteristics of Mesopotamian law			 97 
4. Social structure and law in Mesopotamia				101 
5. The notion of so-called ME and its role				108 

§ 4. Divination in Mesopotamia					111 

§ 5. Asian mode of production and typology 
of primary fire-sides of statehood 
and civilization in Mesopotamia					 119 

Chapter II. Political and legal doctrines 
of Ancient Egypt							 126 

§ 1. Formation and Development 
of Ancient Egyptian statehood 					 126 
1. Historical sources and chronology					 126 
2. Theoretical aspects of formation 
of the ancient Egyptian statehood 					 136 
§ 2. Ancient Egyptian religion					 141 
1. The earliest forms of ancient Egyptian religion			 141 
2. Leading aspects of ancient Egyptian religion			 146 

§ 3. Political views in Ancient Egypt				 163 
1. The power of Pharaoh						 163 
2. Other lordly positions in Ancient Egypt				 174 
3. Political oratory							 176 

§ 4. Law and Justice in Ancient Egypt				  179 
1. Early research on ancient Egyptian law. 179 
2. System of justice and substance of law 
in Ancient Egypt							  180 

§ 5. The relationship of the ancient Egyptian religion 
and culture with European ancient world, 
Judaism and Christianity						  193 
1. Relationship with the European ancient world			 193 
2. The connection to Judaism						 195 
3. Relationship with Christianity					 196 

Chapter III. Political and legal doctrines 
of Ancient Iran							 201 

§ 1. The main focus of Ancient Iran’s 
socio-political developments					 201 
1. Pre-ahemenid’s era							 201 
2. Ahemenid’s dynasty era						 205 
3. Post-ahemenid’s era						 224 

§ 2. Religion, political doctrine and law of ancient Iran		 229 
1. Zoroastrianism 							 229 
2. Mithraism								 253 
3. Manichaeism							 263 
4. Nestorianism							 274 

[b]Chapter IV. Political and legal doctrines 
of Judea								 277 
§ 1. Key highlights from ethnic, 
religious and state Jews history					 277 
1. Beginning								 277 
2. Conquest of Canaan and the time of the judges			 284 
3. The House of David and revitalized Judea			 289 
4. Under the Greek government					 297 
5. Again, an independent Judea					 299 
6. Judea during the Roman Empire					 302 
7. Jews in Babylon							 312 
8. Jews in Arabia							 316 
§ 2. Jewish Biblical Studies						 318 
§ 3. Essence of Jewish law						 350 
§ 4. Jewish doctrine of power, state and individual 		 357 

[b]Chapter V. Political and legal doctrines 
of Ancient China							 374 
§ 1. Main points of the socio - 
history of Ancient China						 374 
1. Beginning								 374 
2. State and empire of the dynasty 
Chzhau (Zhou), also called the Qing Dynasty (Blue)		 379 
3. Empire of the Han Dynasty					 383 
4. The ancient Chinese emperors and their functions		 384 
5. National Assembly in Ancient China				 388 
6. Indigenous nature of Chinese civilization 
and its alternativeness to the European 				 389 

§ 2. Socio-political and legal views 
of Ancient China							 393 
1. Mythology								 393 
2. Shamanism								 396 
3. Historiography							 402 
4. Teachings of Gun-chzhou						 407 
5. Teachings of legism						 409 
6. Teachings of Lao Tszi and daosism				 422 
7. Teachings of Confucius and Confucianism			 431 
8. Teachings of Mo-Di and moism					 460 
9. Teachings of Buddhism						 468 

§ 3. Basic principles and specificity 
of Ancient Chinese law						 471 

Chapter VI. Political and legal doctrines 
of Ancient India							477 

§ 1. Major historical, cultural and civilizing 
dimensions of ancient Indian society					477 
1. Historical notes							477 
2. Vedic philosophy							479 
3. Brahmanism							483 
4. Shramanism						 	484 
5. Bhagavadgitta						 	487 
6. Schools of Indian philosophy					488 
7. Hinduism							 	502 

§ 3. Main sources of socio-political 
and legal views of ancient Indian society				504 
1. Buddhism and power					 	504 
2. Manu Laws							 	516 
3. "Arthashastra“	 						519 

§ 4. Main conceptual dimensions 
the socio-political and legal thought 
of Ancient India							 527 
1. Ancient Indian model of organization of society			 527 
2. Concepts of world order and organization 
public relations							 529 
3. The concept of political power					539 
4. Politics and morality, personality and society			544 
5. Specifics of the ancient Indian law				545 

Chapter VII. Politico-legal status 
and views of Hunnish Empire					547 

§ 1. Formation of the economy of Hunnish society 
and its state system							547 

§ 2. Hunnish structure of society and state			 558 

§ 3. Socio-political system and organization 
of power in Hunnish Empire					 561 

§ 4. Great Migration of Peoples 
and Hunnish substrate						 567 

Sources								 569
_________________
Ianko N. Iankov-Velyovski, political prisoner No.1 of communist Bulgaria (according to "Amnesty International").

Янков Янко, Прогностика. Теоретико-методологически проблеми. 
– С., „Янус”, 1993. – 288 с.
Iankov Ianko (Yankov Yanko), Prognostics. Theoretical and Methodological 
Problems. – Sofia, Ianus Publishing Co., 1993. – 288 pp.
Yankov Yanko, Prognostic. Problèmes thèoriques et mèthodologiques. - Sofia,
“Yanus”, 1993. – 288 pp.
Ianko Iankov,  Prognostik. Theoretisch-methodologische Probleme. – Sofia,
Janus, 1993. – 288 S.
Introduction 8
Chapter I. Philosophical and Methodological 
Problems of Prognostics 13
1. Genetic problems of prognostics 14
2. Pre-methodological problems of prognostics 17
3. Systematic problems of prognostics 26
4. Methodological problems of prognostics 34
Chapter II. Philosophical and Methodological 
Problems in Prognostics 43
1.Ontological aspects 44
1.1. Causation, development and regularities 46
1.2. Reality and non-reality;
possibility and non-possibility; 
necessity and chance;
probability and non-probability 58
1.3. Time as a form of existence of matter 70
2.Gnostic and logical aspects 90
2.1. Prognostics as a cognition 90
2.2. The problem of truth
in prognostic cognition 104
Chapter III. Conceptual and Terminological 
Apparatus of Prognostics 114
Forecasts 118
Prognostics 124
The Hypothesis 126
The Supposition 130
Anticipation (Premonition) 130
The Concepts 131
Drawing up the Project 131
The Program 132
Planning 134
Chapter IV. Research Organization 
and Prognostics Techniques 138
The establishment of prognostics bodies 139
Consecutive steps of prognostics activities 141
Information problems 
of the process of prognostics 147
Principles of prognostics 150
Methods of prognostics 153
Typology 153
Essentials of the methods 156
4.5.2.A. Extrapolation 156
4.5.2.B. Expert opinion 175
4.6. Assessment of reliability 
and precision of forecasts 207
Summary (Bulgarian) 216
Summary (English) 226
Appendixes 234

*  *  *

					Jill Elliot,
					BS & L N  Manager,
					Faculty of Law,
					University of Southampton
					Southampton SO 17 IBJ
					United Kingdom
					Tel: +44 (0) 1703 592376
					Fax: +44 (0) 1703 593885
					E-mail: jill.elliott @soton.ac.uk

March 26st, 1998

	Re: Participation the First International Conference
	on Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Winchester,
	July 8-11, 1998

	Dear Jill:
	Please find enclosed within this letter the Registration Form for Participation the First International Conference on Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Winchester, July 8-11, as well as a copy of the paper I am submitting for Conference, entitled “Values of Psychology of Law in Communist and Post-Communist Bulgaria”.
	I am sending the above mentioned by post as well as through E-mail.
	Please excuse me for any unconvenience, but because the fees are equal to my half year salary, I need complete certainty concerning my participation.
	This is why after receiving a confirmation from your side for including  my paper in the agenda of the Conference, as well as a letter to your Embassy in Sofia (plus certified copy for me) concerning my participation in the Conference, I will send the fees for both events (Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Diversion from Gaol), plus payment for Erasmus Park accommodation (180+100 Pound Sterling).
	Information you may find useful: I am author of the first in Bulgaria book on The Psychology of Law: An Introduction (320 pp.), as well as to numerous publications concerning interdisciplinary law problems.
	Hoping to hear from you ASAP,
Sincerely,
Ianko Nikolov Iankov
Associate Professor
Institute for Legal Studies
at Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
4, Serdika Street,
Sofia  1000, Bulgaria

Psychology of Law Value in Communist
and Post-Communist Bulgaria
			A scientific report, furnished for participation
			at the First International Conference on
			Therapeutical Jurisprudence to be held
			between July 8 and July 11, 1998 in
			Winchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain

	The history of communist society indisputably uncovers the fact that the creation and formation of any science and practical activity has ever been subordinated to the paradigmal adjustment of considering every science and every activity a part of “the servant’s milieu of policy”. Although various in strength and depth of penetration, the manifestation of this regularity permeated  absolutely all domains of science, commencing from mathematics and physics  and  ending on philosophy, psychology and law.
	In Bulgaria this general regularity of unconditional placing of science and practice in complete dependence with the communist power policy manifested itself at the fullest for half a century.  In conformity with the totally prevailing communist ideology, looking at law as the most significant instrument for domination and  administration, “service of policy” in the sphere of legal science, legal practice and the relevant  border sciences and practical  trends, was considered a quite natural  manifestation of “the fullest scientific  objectivity” and of  “the highest scientific value”. Moreover,  any refusal of  being a servant of the above-described type  and any indication of independent scientific opinion was deemed  an intolerable encroachment on  political power pillars and, to the effect of Lenin’s  logic of ”political medicalism”,  “a dangerous psychological illness of the personality”, needing to be subjected to a broad range of “therapeutical procedures”  .
	In these occasions, the political secret services directly or indirectly got themselves involved, which  irregardless of the  variety of methods used applied three basic strategies: 1.  “soft” breaking of the personal will by the methods of  blackmail,  of transformation of  refusal into “consent” and of making  the free personality into an instrument deprived of will in the hands of the secret services; 2. Brutal  suspension from scientific work,  deprivation of the scholar to find any employment position, including  the lowest qualified employment for him to earn his family’s daily bread, placement of his family-members to various methods of pursuit and repression; 3. Savage violation on the scholar, on grounds of  definite ideological statements, provided by law,  by sending him to a hospital for metal diseases, to a labour camp for “re-education”  by means of primitive and sweat physical labour or at prison’s  special rigid  regime. In addition, in  these occasions evidence was usually absolutely unnecessary to be available, collected and objectively discussed by Court, having in mind that presentation of evidence is necessary with proper legal proceeding investstigation for the application of the relevant legal provisions and for the pronouncement of the verdict;  it was in this manner that arbitrariness loomed large in its fullest and purest mode, and the explanation of the verdict with the legal provisions, pointed out,  was actually deprived of grounds and contrary to law in terms of logic and law, and was practically equal to the verdict’s  explanation by, say,  any statement from any legal act, any statement from the Koran, from the Bible, from mythology and folklore, from Dostoevsky’s  novel “Furies”, from  the writings of Marx, Engels or Lenin, or merely from the telephone directory.
	It was in this manner and in these general conditions in Bulgaria that only legal sciences and scientific trends, bordering on law, which the Communist power immediately needed for  propaganda, demagogue and didactic purposes (i.e. for training of undergraduates and for qualification upgrading of practicing lawyers  at the low administration levels),  officially sprang up to exist. Moreover, their development and elaboration was predominantly assigned and admitted only to scholars, who strictly observed  the  requirement for Communist ideology and practice loyalty and for total denial of independent private scientific standpoint.  It was in this way and in these circumstances of absolutely full dependence of the legal science and practice on the policy , as well as of  the scholars on the repressive and “therapeutical” mechanisms of the Communist power, that the coming into being and shape of the Psychology of Law as an independent objective scientific trend was completely impossible.
	Psychology of Law’s outright existence impossibility in Bulgaria  was determined also by a multitude of Communist power  specific conceptions in this facet. The most general paradigmal bent postulated  that everything was after all policy and there was and could not be any sphere, independent on policy and on the specific interference of the Communist power. In the meantime some strategic scientific and practical trends were existent, to which the power paid special attention. The fact was considered a public secret among intellectuals that the legal scientific and practical  field  was much more strategic than the  psychological scientific and practical  one, but even for those, who worked  in these fields (of course, in the other fields, too), it was hard to  hear out and still harder to recognize the existence of special strategic elaborations,  performed by the order of the secret political services for use by the supreme officers of state. Elaborations of the kind were not made  in the then only existent two officially recognized legal scientific units ( the Faculty for Law at the University of Sofia and the Institute for Legal Sciences at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) and  scholars were officially preoccupied  with pre-term designed “classic” and “public” topics. Among them any topics were “naturally” absent which were qualified as “non-classic” or “non-public” and  were of peculiar scientific interest to the supreme officers of state. And at the above described strategic preference Psychology of Law  was reckoned to those scientific trends, which were considered non-subject for presentation to the “public interest” , and that was why  interest to it on the part of scholars, who had  delineated predilection for publicity and the relevant humaneness,  was at all means tried to be eliminated.
	This was the most general mechanism, the outcome of which was that none of the mentioned only two officially and publicly existent scientific units was allowed  to investigate the issues, relating to Psychology of Law, by officially approved scientific scheme.  The sole scientific publication in this aspect was made as an out-of-the-scope-of-scheme one, to a certain extent conspiratorially (in the course of its elaboration authors had not out of intuition told anybody what they were doing) and was published  with the help of two editors from the then only one academic magazine, who, as it became clear afterwards,  knew  in advance and quite well  what the publication’s effect would be, but had their own (and of others) reasons for that effect’s bringing forth. And the effect was the placement of the two young authors in the conditions of their first clearly shaped  conflict with the official administrative power and the political secret services, and one of the authors, who meanwhile had offered some more  similar elaborations in other spheres, bordering on law,  commenced to firmly and unflinchingly assert his right to free scientific opinion, which resulted into the wide opening for him to go through the doors, leading to all “circles of  Hell”, publicly identifying itself with “the socialist paradise on the Earth”.
* 
In a couple of years of unsuccessful efforts by the official power and the secret political police to  break the will and conscience of this author, he was fired from his scientific position, was by non-official data sent into exile to  the country’s outskirts for two years, totally deprived of the opportunity to deal with scientific work, then was legally banished for two years to a labour camp and finally was sentenced by political  verdict, as said person had already spent in prison  six (6) years at extremely rigid regime, during which time, the Amnesty International organization had recognized him as Bulgaria’s prisoner N 1. After the complete endurance of his sentenced verdict and following the political changes in East Europe in the autumn of 1989,  he was amnestied by Parliament’s act, and as a separate action the Supreme Court repealed the verdict and proclaimed him innocent and sentenced innocent on complete lack of  evidence, required be furnished by law.  After that this person became  a politician and a senator (a deputy  at the so called Great National Assembly or Parliament), and further in his capacity of a scholar he produced  a succession of scientific research, among which the bulky book “An Introduction to Psychology of Law”. This man, by the way, is today presenting to your attention  this paper.
	Of course, the lack of publicly recognized scientific publications in the area of Psychology to Law does not mean that there were no works in this area during that time. Throughout the period the supreme officers of state made use of the Psychology of Law’s issues scientific works,  meant only for them and developed  by special  lawyer and psychologist teams, working in strictly secret  scientific units, incorporated at the system of the Bulgarian KGB subsidiaries.  This Psychology of Law was developed  only and just as a repressive science, as a “criminal psychology” attending the need of the Communist power of total supervision upon  human personality, as “psychological weapon” aiming to destroy the mental structure and stability of personality, as a scientific instrumentarium for  turning free human will  into  a zombified  political and social demeanor.  Scientific  developments were prevailingly furnished  in single folds as “reports and analyses” on the special strategic and tactic programs for action of the most supreme officers of the Communist authority, while  a small part of them  found “limited publicity” in the secret service bulletins with circulation between 20 and 50 pieces.
	The analysis of facts undoubtedly indicates that the Communist power has ever been bound just and only with the repressive model of Psychology of Law and has ever explicitly repudiated the humanist model of this science. Already since Stalin’s time the communist power has acquired the alphabetical history of the repressive psychology that the humanism is the natural barrier against the antihumanistic aggression of power and that terror is possible just and only in a situation of continuously growing deficit of humaneness in society. At such paradigmal bent the most logical  power strategy is and can be just one - the unflinching and  uncompromising  destruction of the humanistic model of the Psychology of Law and of its heralds. The Communist repression history  shows that this strategy  was “scientifically” motivated not only as “the most logical one”, not only as “the most correct one”, but even as “the most humane one”.
	However, what has changes in Bulgaria in 1989 brought to Law and Psychology of Law?  Have they modified the repressive paradigmal bent in science and political and legal practice ?
	During the past eight years the decaying totalitarian society in Bulgaria took his way not to a civil but to a criminal society,  the so called “tender revolution”  indisputably reveled the image of the “great criminal  revolution”, organized by the Bulgarian subdivisions of the Red Army, KGB and the Red Mafia as a subsequent re-allotment  of the available and prospective (received by foreign loans) national wealth  among the new (criminal and Mafia) elite, nomineed by the ex (socialist) elite. In the course of these eight years every government came to power by means of the said elite’s mechanisms, publicly  announced its firm will towards “the political and economic system’s adaptation to European and World standards”, and in the mean time it  firmly and unyieldingly  conducted a strategy of accelerated robbery, impoverishment and criminalization of the entire community.
	From the standpoint of the repressive model of the Psychology of Law, in these eight years the strategy of both unhidden and hidden power  the population’s fear of the totalitarian state and of the economic  catastrophe gradually to be transformed to an inadequate political, economic and legal behavior, a mass folly, pretending to be political and economic freedom  and pluralism and hiding the real political and economic interests and aims of the Red Mafia,  and then said fear to grow into a fear of  democracy.  As a transformation structure of the Communist power today’s Red Mafia quite well knows that the natural pillars of the personality  are completely lost in the conditions of a country and community destroyed, thus regularly falling an easy prey  and an active  accomplice to its antihumanistic aggression; moreover that it, the Red Mafia, has turned the whole country and community into its structural units and has planted the spirit of  mercilessness  to all as an pattern of human dignity, even a pattern of humaneness.
	Consequently, after the coming of changes in Bulgaria since 1989, the tragic dependence of the science and the policy scholar has not only been abolished, but its existence has been impregnated with far greater grounds.  The paradigmal repressive bent of the Psychology of Law was left absolutely intact in its profound nature, although it has been modified in many facets (which, by the way, are just flexible improvements).  Meanwhile, the humanistic paradigmal bent has become a synonym to “sloppy feebleness”, “sentimental inadequacy”,  not worthy for people who wish he/she and his/her children to survive. And the only proposed way of survival in these circumstances in Bulgaria today is to join the multitude of most varied political, economic and force Red Mafia’s structural formations,  which once and forever  eliminates all and any possibilities for  the repressive predisposition and the repressive model of power and society to be driven aside, as well as for  the humanistic predisposition and the humanistic model  to be given the possibility to come into being and strive.
	Is and could, however,  this  essentially deep criminal and antihumanist society, euphemistically qualified as “post-totalitarian” and “post-communist”, be examined as a “patient”, subject to political, juridical and psychological “therapy”, and is there at all any “effective therapy” which can be applied to it ?
	The answer to this question certainly comes far beyond the topical area of the Psychology of Law, exceeds the possibilities to be stated in a modest paper like this one, but it is essentially offered in the experience of “post-hitlerist” Germany and “post-military” Japan.  As for the therapy what is necessary is not only the “patient’s readiness”, but the humanistic predisposition of the “therapist”.

*  *  *

Bulgaria's red mafia on Europe's trail
"Display a printer-friendly version of this page."1"Send this page by e-mail."1"Display a PDF version of this page."111
Ilija Trojanow, 19 January 2006 
Subjects:
•	europe
•	democracy & power
•	future of europe
The experience of the veteran dissident and lawyer Yanko Yankov shows that Bulgaria's communist inheritance is still damaging the country, writes Ilija Trojanow. 
About the author
Ilija Trojanow is a writer whose books include Along the Ganges. Originally from Bulgaria, he found political asylum in German.
There is a growing concern in western Europe over Bulgaria' s forthcoming entry into the European Union, scheduled for 1 January 2007. Fingers are pointed at the massive trafficking with drugs and prostitutes, at the growing number of execution-style killings in broad daylight, at police brutality and the prevalent corruption in customs and courts. 
But even the most critical reports ignore the fact that such problems reach deep into the very fabric of Bulgarian society. The rot is so profound that it is impossible to distinguish between state institutions and the mafia, between the totalitarian past of the former secret service and its current omnipotence. To accept Bulgaria into the European Union at this stage would be to condone a failed state lacking even the basic structures of the rule of law and the most minimal exigencies of social justice. 
A particular, individual case is often the best evidence of a general truth. In Bulgaria, the personal fate of Yanko Yankov, a 61-year-old professor of law, is such an example – and it is not without irony that his experience is itself proof of the criticism he has levelled against the state. 
In some countries this courageous man would have been honoured as a hero after the fall of communism in the country in 1989-90. In Bulgaria he is still harassed, vilified and isolated, and most recently has been deprived of his livelihood. 
Yanko Yankov's predicament is rooted in a decades-long struggle for justice. As a law student in the 1970s, Yankov wrote a manifesto suggesting ways of legally resisting the communist system that had ruled Bulgaria since 1944. He was accepted into the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS) as a research fellow in 1975, but his readiness to draft petitions defending the rights of persecuted citizens soon made him an object of surveillance by the secret service. On 18 March 1982, Yankov was expelled from the academy. 
Yankov was undeterred, and started to pass on documents on human-rights abuses in Bulgaria to the embassies of Britain, the United States, France and Germany in Bulgaria’s capital, Sofia. In summer 1983, he founded a group in the northwest town of Montana that distributed pamphlets critical of the state. This illegal act led him to be banned from Sofia and sent into "internal exile" to work in a chemical factory in the provinces. 
When this measure too failed to silence him, he was arrested. On 24 December 1984, Yankov was sentenced to twelve years in jail for establishing and leading an anti-state organisation and for anti-state propaganda (the sentence was reduced on appeal to six-and-a-half years). Amnesty International and Helsinki Watch declared him Bulgaria’s foremost political prisoner.
Yankov was released on 31 October 1989 into Bulgaria’s rapidly evolving "perestroika", the local equivalent of the Mikhail Gorbachev-era transformations in the Soviet Union that would soon topple Bulgaria's homegrown communist leader, Todor Zhivkov. The American ambassador ignored his request for a visa, comforting Yankov with the advice that he was needed in Bulgaria, for great changes were about to happen. "We are relying on you", he said. 
Indeed, Yankov's democratic career in the new conditions of open politics made a promising start. In the "roundtable talks" designed to plan the post-communist system, he represented the social democrats. But after protesting once too often against the numerous compromises between the communists and the opposition, he was excluded from the proceedings. 
He was elected to parliament as a member of the "great national assembly" in the free elections of 1990, and became head of the parliamentary human-rights commission, but he resigned before the end of his mandate, protesting that not a single person responsible for the crimes of the state during the forty-five years of totalitarian rule had even been charged. In 1991 the academy of sciences reinstated him. He founded the tiny Liberal Congress Party and edited its weekly newspaper for several years. Yanko Yankov continues to be an active member of the Society of Democratic Lawyers in Bulgaria.
Against the current 
The career is one thing, its inner meaning another. Today as in the past, Yankov's is a lonely voice of truth in a public landscape that consists of pits and even larger pits. In one of his books he has written:
"Bulgaria is in a huge political crisis determined by the fact that the former secret service, a sub-division of the KGB, has transformed itself into a subsidiary of the Russian red mafia, whose genesis and method of work profoundly differ from all previously known mafia networks. Today, the state and organisations like parties and trade unions, are controlled by the mafia, and are thus part of its structure on a higher level than the trafficking with drugs or weapons. The mafia decides who is to be president, prime minister, high court judge or director of a public institution. In other words, while in most states the mafia is within the state, in Russia and Bulgaria the state is part of the mafia."
Bulgaria's elites do not take kindly to such criticism. Yankov has been intimidated by strangers on the street; his offices have been ransacked or bolted (a devious strategy perfected in democratic Bulgaria, where party members decide to "break away" and requisition the offices by means of a locksmith). Most recently, after he was nominated for the post of prosecutor-general by a group of independent lawyers, an anonymous phone call threatened the life of his family. Now, he has lost his job.
What inspires such fear, such menace? Among Yankov's campaigning activities, the most provocative seems to be his agitation over the treatment of Bulgaria's Turkish minority (of around 800,000 people, or 9% of the population). As a legal consultant, he was the moving force in the campaign of Bulgarian Turks to seek justice and recompense for the cultural assaults, expropriation of property and expulsion to Turkey they suffered in the mid-1980s (effectively "ethnic cleansing", although this term acquired its contemporary usage only with the wars of ex-Yugoslavia in the early 1990s). 
In a project given the cynical title "renaissance" by Todor Zhivkov's regime, the Bulgarian state forced the country's Turks to change their names to Slavic ones, destroyed Muslim graveyards, prohibited the usage of Turkish in schools, and arrested and tortured those who opposed these measures. The "rebirth" of the Turkish minority culminated in the expulsion of 300,000 people in 1989. 
Yankov convinced a number of victims to lay charges against the perpetrators and to sign a petition that is to be deposited with the Bulgarian president and the EU. It is unlikely that the current minister of justice, Georgi Petkanov, welcomes this effort to redress old injustice – for as a public prosecutor in a small town in the Rhodope mountains, he was one of the midwives of this "renaissance". 
Power and dissent
The backlash was swift and brutal. On 5 December 2005, Yankov was once again expelled from the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences – and granted only fifteen days’ severance pay – by the director of its Institute of Legal Studies, Tsvetana Kamenova. No reasons were stated. 
It might come as a surprise that a professor of law disregards the stipulations of her own institution, for only the BA's academic council has the authority to exclude a scholar. But this is Bulgaria. Yanko Yankov knows Tsvetana Kamenova from his student days. A daughter of the nomenklatura (her father was a high-ranking secret service officer), she worked as a "specialist" for many years in several major western European cities; in other words, as an agent of the two principal departments of the service, dealing respectively with foreign espionage and counter-espionage. 
Kamenova herself confessed this in a personal conversation with Yankov after the 1997 elections, when a leading newspaper published the rumour that she was being considered for the post of interior minister. More recently, she was nominated as a judge to the International Court of Justice in The Hague (and has even claimed that she not only holds the trust of the "west", but that all her actions are on behalf of the "west"). 
Her deputy at the academy, Vesselin Zankov, is an old secret-service colleague; another esteemed professor there, Vassil Mrachkov, was the last prosecutor-general of the Todor Zhivkov era. During the brief period when the service's dossiers were partly accessible to its former victims (1997-2001), Yankov furthermore discovered that two of his fellow-students had assisted the secret service to prepare its legal case against him: none other than Georgi Petkanov, and Nikola Filchev (Bulgaria's former prosecutor-general, replaced by Boris Velchev on 19 January 2006 after being criticised for his failure to tackle corruption).
From the inside it makes sense: Yanko Yankov is a democrat among "ex"-communists who still inhabit the system's political and moral mindset, and as such one too many. The red mafia cannot tolerate even a single voice of dissent. They deride Yankov as a madman. This too is in line with tradition, an even older one. The greatest Bulgarian poet, Hristo Botev, once wrote: "The worthy ones are regarded as mad, the stupid ones respected throughout." 

*  *  *

HIGHEST FLOOR CORRUPTED - IN BULGARIA, NOT ONLY IN UK
Address for letters:
Ianko Iankov
Dianabad, 
Block 4, ap. 38
1172 Sofia 
Web site: http://iankov.info 
Web site: http://iankov.com 
E-mail : iankov.bg@mail.bg 
Bulgaria 
***************************
12 October 2007 
To/към: 
LPC-Euro-Just-01/ 13 November 2006;
LPC-Euro-Just-02/ 17 November 2006; 
LPC-Euro-Just-03/ 12 January 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-04/ 22 January 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-05/ 01 February 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-06/ 28 March 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-07/ 10 April 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-08/ 09 May 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-09/ 19 May 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-10/ 21 May 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-11/ 30 May 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-12/ 31 May 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-13/ 02 June 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-14/ 11 June 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-15/ 16 June 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-16/ 25 June 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-17/ 01 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-18/ 06 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-19/ 07 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-20/ 11 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-21/ 21 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-22/ 27 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-23/ 30 July 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-24/ 22 August 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-25/ 14 September 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-26/ 16 September 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-27/ 21 September 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-28/ 24 September 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-29/ 26 September 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-30/ 02 October 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-31/ 07 October 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-32/ 10 October 2007;
LPC-Euro-Just-33/ 12 October 2007;
About:
Crime in London and Sofia,
committed by the Bulgarian secret services
The Attorney General's Office
20 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0NF
United Kingdom
E-mail: correspondenceunit@attorneygeneral.gsi.gov.uk 
E-mail: foi@attorneygeneral.gsi.gov.uk 
E-mail: complaints@attorneygeneral.gsi.gov.uk 
Serious Fraud Office
Elm House
10-16 Elm Street
London WC1X 0BJ
United Kingdom
Email: public.enquiries@sfo.gsi.gov.uk 
United Kingdom Cabinet
10 Downing Street, 
London, SW1A 2AA
United Kingdom 
E-mail: mst@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk 
E-mail: Contactus@communities.gsi.gov.uk 
E-mail: enquiries@culture.gov.uk
E-mail: www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/ContactUs/
E-mail: john.prescott@odpm.gov.uk
E-mail: dfes.ministers@dfes.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: helpline@defra.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: dhmail@dh.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: enquiry@dfid.gov.uk
E-mail: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: lslo@gtnet.gov.uk
E-mail: Leader@CommonsLeader.x.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: pcosecretariat@pco.x.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: scottish.secretary@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: dti.enquiries@dti.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: douglas.alexander@dft.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: ministers@hm-treasury.gov.uk
E-mail: wales.office@walesoffice.gsi.gov.uk
E-mail: ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk
His Excellency
Mr. Hans-Gert Poettering - 
President of the European Parliament
Rue Wiertz
B-1047 Brussels
E-mail: klaus.welle@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: anthony.teasdale@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: webmasterpresident@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: katrin.ruhrmann@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: jesus.gomez@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: Petitions@europarl.europa.eu 
E-mail: civis@europarl.europa.eu 
His Excellency
Mr. Jose Manuel Barroso - 
President of the European Commission
Secretariat General of the European Commission,
Unit SG/B/4
rue de la Loi 200,
B- 1049 Brussels 
E-mail: comm-web@ec.europa.eu 
https://www.secure.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/citizensMail/secured/cmRequest.do?cmLanguage=bg 
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/ 
His Excellency
Mr. Franco Frattini -
Vice President & Commissioner
of Justice, Freedom and Security
European Commission
B-1049 Brussels
E-mail: 
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/frattini/online_form_en.htm 
E-mail: 
http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/contact_us2_en.htm 
His Excellency
Mr. Olli Rehn -
Commissioner of Enlargement
European Commission
B-1049 Brussels
E-mail: cab-rehn-web-feedback@ec.europa.eu 
E-mail: elarg-webmaster@ec.europa.eu 
His Excellency
Mr. P. Nikiforos Diamandouros - 
EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
1 Avenue du President Robert Schuman
B.P. 403
F – 67001 Strasbourg Cedex
E-mail: euro-ombudsman@europarl.eu.int 
Amnesty International
E-mail: alexand@amnesty.org.uk 
E-mail: sct@amnesty.org.uk 
E-mail: gewerkschafterInnen@amnesty.at 
E-mail: info@amnesty.at 
E-mail: amnesty@aivl.be 
E-mail: jpchenu@aibf.be 
E-mail: bureaudeliege@aibf.be 
E-mail: amnesty-eu@aieu.be
E-mail: webmestre@amnesty.fr 
E-mail: service@amnesty.ch 
E-mail: msk@amnesty.org 
International Helsinki Federation
for Human Rights (IHF)
E-mail: kolb@ihf-hr.org 
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
E-mail: Chicago@hrw.org 
E-mail: hrwnyc@hrw.org 
E-mail: hrwdc@hrw.org 
E-mail: hrwuk@hrw.org 
E-mail: hrwbe@hrw.org 
E-mail: berlin@hrw.org 
Secretary General 
of the Council of Europe
E-mail: infopointe@coe.int
Email: visites@coe.int
E-mail: pressunite@coe.int 
E-mail: bureau.paris@coe.int 
E-mail: bureau.bruxelles@coe.inte 
To Their Excellencies the Ambassadors,
accredited in Sofia from:
1) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
E-mail: britembinf@mail.orbitel.bg 
E-mail: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk 
2) Kingdom of Belgium;
E-mail: Philippe.Beke@diplobel.be 
E-mail: Sofia@diplobel.org 
E-mail: ambabel@einet.bg 
3) Federal Republic of Germany;
E-mail: Mil-1@sofi.diplo.de 
E-mail: Mil-100@sofi.diplo.de 
E-mail: info@sofia.goethe.org 
E-mail: sprach-1@sofi.auswaertiges-amt.de 
4) French Republic;
E-mail: presse@ambafrance-bg.org 
5) Kingdom of Netherlands;
E-mail: sof@minbuza.nl 
6) The European Commission Delegation to Bulgaria;
E-mail: delegation-bulgaria@ec.europa.eu 
E-mail: cip@eubcc.bg 
7) United States of America;
E-mail: Sofia@usembassy.bg 
E-mail: sofia.office.box@mail.doc.gov 
8) Swiss Confederation.
E-mail: Sofia@sdc.net 
E-mail: sof.vertretung@eda.admin.ch 
E-mail: info@eda.admin.ch 
E-mail: sts@eda.admin.ch 
E-mail: generalsekretaer@eda.admin.ch 
E-mail: zaps@eda.admin.ch 
E-mail: valentina.dimitrova@sdc.net 
Your Excellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
My name is Ianko Nikolov Iankov. Detailed information about me is available in English, French, German and Bulgarian on the following Internet addresses:
http://iankov.com/dl/biobibliografia.pdf,
http://iankov.blogspot.com/2007/06/blog-post.html, 
http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-europefuture/bulgaria_3194.jsp,
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/Nikolay41.
From 1975 till now me and all my family members have been objects of more than one hundred acts of crime attempted to our lives, committed by functionaries of communist and post-communist state authority; all that without any chance for law court justice.
Here and now I am bringing to your attention only one group of crimes committed in London and Sofia.
I.
On August 27th, 1999 I landed at London and immediately asked for political asylum which resulted in administrative case Port Reference TN2/110797, HM Immigration Office, Terminal 2, Heathrow Airport, London. On September 15th, 1999 a separate apartment was placed at my disposal.
On June 1st, 2000 during my morning jogging in Finnsburry Park completely unknown person with Bulgarian origin threatened me that if I continue to stay in England and not going back to Bulgaria, my family members shall be killed or kidnapped and sold to brothels all over the world; after that the stranger told me, explicitly despite what happen with us, the British authorities will not defend any one of us.
On June 2nd, 2000 I wrote a request for help to the official British authorities; on June 3rd, 2000 I asked for help the ambassadors of Great Britain, USA, France, and Germany. Meanwhile the British Embassy (through an official letter) refused to issue visas to my wife and my children, far into the night of June 7th, 2000 I landed at Sofia Airport.
Later, through friends of mine with high positions in executive and prosecutor-court of law systems, I was successful to collect exclusively correct information proving that in connection with my stay in London me, as well as all my close relatives, have been object of top secret action of Bulgarian secret services.
Almost all complete information, as well as the facts and evidences about this case I wrote and pointed in my official letters to the Attorney General of Bulgaria, as well as in voluminous text of 115 (One hundred fifteen) pages, addressed to the State Secretary of the Interior of Great Britain, Mr. John Reed, within three recommended letters.
Regretfully till now I have not received absolutely any answer from both addressee of my letters.
It is of utmost clarity that the Bulgarian Attorney General is not answering because he is a representative and defender of the criminal Bulgarian clan of the Russian Red Mafia, but it is not clear enough for me why the British Secretary of the Interior forgot to give an answer.
II.
By specifying that the details are described in my official requests for investigation of the crimes completed in Bulgaria and in the Great Britain, I shall be very concise by showing only the essence of the case.
1) On the occasion of my request for political asylum Amnesty International assigned a task to a team of the French TV Station “ARTE” to complete filming for creation of a documentary film concerning my case; later the film has been broadcasted on December 15th, 2000; at the moment being the film is accessible at the following Internet addresses: http://youtube.com/watch?v=BlZXESNc_cM, 
http://iankov.blogspot.com/2007/07/blog-post.html.
2) In this connection the Bulgarian Minister of the Interior has written three official reports to the Prime Minister and to the President of Bulgaria, whereupon a special operational group of the spy department (at the President) and the National State Security (at the Prime Minister) servants has been completed.
3) First operational action completed has been the so called “psychological operation”, addressed towards the British services as well as to the French television team. For that purpose the Bulgarian secret services sent to London the farcical semi-literate member of the Bulgarian Parliament Assen Hristov, who asked for political asylum, too, and later unexpectedly and without any motifs went back to Bulgaria.
4) Soon after December 15th, 1999, when the French television broadcasted the documentary film for me, the Bulgarian secret services have adopted new strategy with the following main elements:
a) Sending a fellow in London in order to tell me that after my refusal to come back to Bulgaria my mother and my son will be assassinated; my two minor daughters, my dead brother’s minor daughter and my wife will be kidnapped and sold to world’s brothels;
b) If nevertheless I decide to stay in London, the kidnapping of my children and my wife shall be completed by three criminals using uninhabited house in deserted village near the Yugoslavian border; where the criminals shall torture the kidnapped and kill at least one of them at the eyes of the rest;
c) Several days after the kidnapping the Bulgarian Minister of the Interior shall declare that upon a successful intelligence work the location of the kidnapped has been discovered, the fighting criminals have been eliminated, and the survivors have been released;
d) At the end the Bulgarian media shall expose the information, that “Ianko Iankov has been warned about the kidnapping, but he has preferred to stay in London”.
III.
Up to me there is an extremely curious circumstance in the above case; there are presented facts giving much larger as well as sinister interpretation; the same facts are in detail described in two of my official requests for inquiry, submitted to the aforesaid diplomatic representatives of the West and to the Secretary of the Interior of Great Britain.
I mean that in order to contact me for collecting “authentic and original information” in London have been sent two dummies with no one of them I ever had personal contact; but I knew for their existence due to during 1990-1994 one of them was an official expert in the President Jelyo Jelev’s team and official expert of the political coalition Union of Democratic Forces, and the other – journalist from the newspaper ‘Democracia”. Their affiliation to the Bulgarian communist secret services was un open secret for the leaders of the Coalition Union of Democratic Forces; I myself as a leader of a political party – member of the aforesaid coalition, I knew that fact.
But the most strange was that, when during February-April 2000 both of them were seeking a meeting with me in London, the first one already have had a job within the German secret services (where he lived with his family), and the spouse of the other (with their son) quite a while ago have been living in Great Britain due to a contract with the British Army, for which she have had analyzed the highest layers of the air space; her house’s telephone number has been 0197-062-67-58.
But the tip of the top of the nosy information is that from the content of an official interview of general Bogomil Bonev (Minister of the Interior of Bulgaria just during my stay in London), published by the media is quite clear that at the same time the British Premier as well as the Bulgarian one were asking from each other to do things prohibited by law in both states. In the context of all above I came to the completely quite normal conclusion that mine and of my family rights and interests have been sacrificed to the most despicable wet bargain.
IV.
Your Exellencies,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As a legitimate citizen of the European Union I insist at all of you to exercise your influence for the following:
1) To motivate the aforesaid Bulgarian representatives and functionaries of the state authority to take into consideration my official requests before them and to undertake a legitimate inquiry of the acts of crime committed against me and my family members;
2) To motivate the aforesaid British representatives and functionaries of the state authority to consider the facts within the described case and to answer me strictly and comprehensively.
October 12th, 2007 Ianko N. Iankov

*  *  *
GENOCIDE! 

Your Excellencies,
My name is Ianko Nikolov Iankov. Detailed information concerning me is available in English, French, German, and Bulgarian on the following Internet addresses: http://iankov.com and http://www.eurochicago.com.
From March 16th till May 18th 2007 I have registered at the Office of the Chief Prosecutor of Bulgaria nine precisely well-founded requests for investigation of the CRIME of GENOCIDE, committed by the Bulgarian post-communist governments against the Bulgarian citizens.
Copies of the same texts I have sent through the traditional post to many European addressee, but later on I have found that my letters have been undelivered, and the addressees have received only the letters sent through Internet. As I understand, the secret services are engaged with the case.
Please find enclosed (through e-mail) the texts of the following letters concerned with my request for investigation of the CRIME of GENOCIDE, committed against the Bulgarian nation:
1) LPC-Embassy-073/March 16th 2007; 
2) LPC-Embassy-075/March 23rd 2007;
3) LPC-Embassy-076/March 26th 2007; 
4) LPC-Embassy-077/March 27th 2007;
5) LPC-Embassy-078/March 28th 2007;
6) LPC-Embassy-079/March 29th 2007;
7) LPC-Euro-Just-07/April 10th 2007;
8) LPC-Embassy-081/April 16th 2007;
9) LPC-Embassy-082/May 18th 2007;
10) LPC-Euro-Just-09/May 19th 2007.
I declare that on the basis of precisely collected and described facts and precisely cited expert opinions, I gave proof of the thesis that all Bulgarian post-communist governments have committed organized and systematic practice of state terrorism, eugenics, social, economic, pension, medical, educational GENOCIDE, out-of-court assassinations and other forms of genocide violence and extermination of the Bulgarian citizens.
In connection with the above cited I approach all of you with the request to engage yourselves with a precise examination of the facts and circumstances submitted by me and to take the appropriated measures.
Enclosure: According the text.
May 31, 2007   Ianko N. Iankov
*  *  *

2010-06-24
ATTEMPT ON THE LIFE OF POLITICAL PRISONER No.1 

Sofia, June 21, 2010 
Attn: 
Prime Minister of Bulgaria 
Minister of Interior 
American Bar Association 
State Department of  the U.S.A. 
Amnesty International 
Ambassadors of the Member States 
the European Union, Switzerland  and the U.S.A. 

Attemmpt on the life of Political Prisoner No.1-Prof.Ianko N. Iankov
Prof. Ianko N. Iankov , declared 25 years ago by "Amnesty International" as a POLITICAL PRISONER № 1 of communism in Bulgaria, was attacked in broad daylight in 15 pm, Monday, June 21, 2010, by two unknown men at the sidewalk in front of  the Metropolitan Courthouse and broke his right arm in several places. 
The famous lawyer, university professor, law defender, fighter for civil rights, an uncompromising opponent of the mafia occupying Bulgarian state,  and talented scientist with more than 50 published books, has become obvious thorn in the eyes of former present secret services as to chop the life and health of him in few meters from the entrance of the symbol of the Third state power (the legal power). 
Prof.Ianko N. Iankov has repeatedly warning the Bulgarian and foreign institutions regarding the  threats against him and his family, but did not receive any policy response. Reply-stabbing came as a semantic message from the mafia, for which the Bulgarian state is a low  level unit. 
We do not turn to the Bulgarian authorities - they are hostage to the mafia. We ask the above Western institutions: ‘- Were you sincere, when quarter-century ago took a stand in defense of Political Prisoner № 1 of communism in Bulgaria? Or you defended him only by a short term considerations? ‘
We would believe in your sincerity, if you stand now in defense of uncompromising fighter for civil rights against the Mafia Prof.Ianko N. Iankov and his family. 
If you conceal now (as the Bulgarian authorities) – we will assume that and then you were not sincere. 
Union of  Lawyers Democrats in Bulgaria